COMPARISON OF PEDAGOGICAL QUALIMETRY WITH TRADITIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSING THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
Keywords:
Pedagogical qualimetry, traditional assessment methods, knowledge of high school studentsAbstract
This article is a study aimed at a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of pedagogical qualimetry and traditional methods of assessing the knowledge of high school students. Pedagogical qualimetry is a modern approach to the assessment of educational achievements based on the use of computer technologies, analytical methods and data. The article discusses the basic principles and methods of pedagogical qualimetry, as well as its potential for improving the educational process. The authors conduct a comparative study of the results of the use of pedagogical qualimetry and traditional methods of assessing the knowledge of high school students based on data collected in a real educational environment. Parameters such as the accuracy of assessments, objectivity, time spent on assessment, and the degree of motivation of students are analyzed.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., ... & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
Marzano, R. J. (2000). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. National Academies Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Assessing Creativity. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 28-34.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11.
Scriven, M. (1991). Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdulkhafizov Bunyod Khakimjonovich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.