COMPARISON OF PEDAGOGICAL QUALIMETRY WITH TRADITIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSING THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Abdulkhafizov Bunyod Khakimjonovich Head Of The Department In Namangan Region, Higher Education Of The Republic Of Uzbekistan, Science And Knowledge Under The Ministry Of Innovation And Of The Agency For Qualifications Assessment, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Pedagogical qualimetry, traditional assessment methods, knowledge of high school students

Abstract

This article is a study aimed at a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of pedagogical qualimetry and traditional methods of assessing the knowledge of high school students. Pedagogical qualimetry is a modern approach to the assessment of educational achievements based on the use of computer technologies, analytical methods and data. The article discusses the basic principles and methods of pedagogical qualimetry, as well as its potential for improving the educational process. The authors conduct a comparative study of the results of the use of pedagogical qualimetry and traditional methods of assessing the knowledge of high school students based on data collected in a real educational environment. Parameters such as the accuracy of assessments, objectivity, time spent on assessment, and the degree of motivation of students are analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., ... & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.

Marzano, R. J. (2000). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. National Academies Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Assessing Creativity. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 28-34.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11.

Scriven, M. (1991). Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-10

How to Cite

Abdulkhafizov Bunyod Khakimjonovich. (2023). COMPARISON OF PEDAGOGICAL QUALIMETRY WITH TRADITIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSING THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. International Scientific and Current Research Conferences, 1(01), 147–149. Retrieved from https://www.orientalpublication.com/index.php/iscrc/article/view/1170