Using Innovative Methods in Teaching Physics at Academic Lyceums

Authors

  • Abdukarimova Dilfuza Anvarjonovna Ministry of Internal Affairs, Fergana academic lyceum, Physics teacher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/geo-55

Keywords:

Innovative teaching methods, Physics education, Hands-on experiments

Abstract

This scientific article explores the importance of incorporating innovative teaching methods in physics education at academic lyceums. As the field of physics continues to evolve and our understanding of the universe deepens, it is crucial to adapt pedagogical approaches to foster a deeper comprehension of the subject matter among students. This article discusses various innovative methods, including hands-on experiments, simulations, and digital tools, and their potential impact on enhancing the learning experience in academic lyceums. By promoting active engagement and critical thinking, these methods can inspire students to pursue careers in physics and related STEM fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

lonzo, A., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers' PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.

Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.

Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Does it matter what we measure? Domain-specific professional knowledge of physics teachers. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l'Education, 37(3), 462–479.

Ergöneç, J., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. (2014). The impact of pedagogical content knowledge on cognitive activa- tion and student learning. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland (pp. 145–160). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

Fischer, H., Neumann, K., Labudde, P., & Viiri, J. (Eds.). (2014b). Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. M€unster, Germany: Waxmann.

Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393–1418.

Milner-Bolotin, M. (2018). Evidence-Based Research in STEM Teacher Education: From Theory to Practice. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00092

Nordine, J., Sorge, S., Delen, I., Evans, R., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Nilsson, P., Ropohl, M., & Stadler, M. (2021). Promoting Coherent Science Instruction through Coherent Science Teacher Education: A Model Framework for Program Design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1902631

Downloads

Published

2023-10-18

How to Cite

Abdukarimova Dilfuza Anvarjonovna. (2023). Using Innovative Methods in Teaching Physics at Academic Lyceums. International Scientific and Current Research Conferences, 1(1), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.37547/geo-55