Pedagogical Conditions for Developing the Design-Engineering Competence Of Future Engineers
Keywords:
Design-engineering competence, project-based learning, CDIOAbstract
Design-engineering competence—an integrated set of knowledge, procedural skills, professional values, and reflective habits for solving open-ended technical problems—is a core outcome of contemporary engineering education. This article substantiates pedagogical conditions that most effectively cultivate this competence in undergraduate programs: authentic problem contexts aligned with industry standards; iterative, model-based design supported by digital tools; structured collaboration and communication regimes; formative assessment embedded in the design process; and a reflective culture that links theory, modeling decisions, and evidence from tests or simulations. Drawing on competence-based education, experiential and sociocultural learning theories, and the CDIO/ABET outcome frameworks, we propose a program-level implementation that sequences progressively complex design experiences, ensures interoperability of tools and standards, and builds faculty capacity for coaching rather than mere software instruction. Findings from implementation in a polytechnic context indicate improved performance in problem framing, parametric modeling, trade-off analysis, and design communication, as well as greater transfer of learning to internships and capstone projects. The article concludes with implications for curriculum architecture, assessment design, and institutional policy to sustain equitable access and academic integrity in AI-enriched design environments.
Downloads
References
Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. — Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984.
Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024–2025. — Baltimore: ABET, 2024.
Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. — Cham: Springer, 2014.
Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., Frey D. D., Leifer L. J. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2005. — Vol. 94, No. 1. — P. 103–120.
Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K.-H. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. — London: Springer, 2007.
Felder R. M., Silverman L. K. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education // Engineering Education. — 1988. — Vol. 78, No. 7. — P. 674–681.
Shuman L. J., Besterfield-Sacre M., McGourty J. The ABET “professional skills” — Can they be taught? // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2005. — Vol. 94, No. 1. — P. 41–55.
Eraut M. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. — London: RoutledgeFalmer, 1994.
ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems — Requirements. — Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xazratqulov Abduvohid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.
