METHODS FOR ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES THROUGH CREATIVE PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

Authors

  • Abdulkhayev Abduvokhid Abdulbori ugli Rеsеаrсhеr оf Nаmаngаn Stаtе Рedаgоgy Institutе, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Creative pedagogy, assessment methods, educational effectiveness

Abstract

The effectiveness of creative pedagogical approaches in contemporary educational settings requires sophisticated assessment methodologies that extend beyond conventional standardized testing. This study examines multiple assessment methods designed to evaluate learning outcomes when creative teaching strategies are implemented. Through a comprehensive analysis of forty-three educational institutions employing creative pedagogical approaches including project-based learning, collaborative inquiry, and interdisciplinary problem-solving we evaluated the comparative efficacy of performance-based assessment, portfolio evaluation, peer assessment, and reflective practice documentation. Findings indicate that multimodal assessment frameworks combining quantitative and qualitative measures provide the most comprehensive evaluation of creative pedagogical effectiveness. Notably, authentic assessment methods demonstrate significantly stronger correlations with sustained learning retention and transfer capability than traditional achievement measures. This paper presents an integrated assessment framework applicable across educational contexts and grade levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Robinson K. Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that's transforming education. Viking Adult; 2015.

Wiggins G, McTighe J. Authentic assessment: Designing assessments for measuring student performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2005.

Meier D. The accelerated learning handbook: A creative guide to designing and delivering faster, more engaging training programs. McGraw-Hill; 2000.

Darling-Hammond L, Snyder J. Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2000;16(5-6):523-545.

Torrance H, Pryor J. Student assessment to support learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education. 2001;42(3):335-350.

Paulson PL, Paulson PR, Meyer CA. What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership. 1991;48(5):60-63.

Topping KJ. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research. 1998;68(3):249-276.

Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher. 2000;29(7):4-14.

Stiggins RJ. Revolutionizing assessment: Empower students, inspire success. Corwin Press; 2008.

Barrett HC. Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. In: Crawford C, Davis N, Cignetti J, editors. Technology and teacher education annual. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 2005. p. 647-654.

Rust C. A research perspective on formative assessment and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2009;120:17-25.

Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press; 1991.

Brookfield SD, Preskill S. Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2005.

Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking MR. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press; 2000.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-10

How to Cite

Abdulkhayev Abduvokhid Abdulbori ugli. (2025). METHODS FOR ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES THROUGH CREATIVE PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION. International Scientific and Current Research Conferences, 1(01), 4–7. Retrieved from https://www.orientalpublication.com/index.php/iscrc/article/view/2153