Developing A Methodology For Enhancing Students' Skills In Searching, Analyzing, Evaluating, And Drawing Conclusions From Scientific Information In Chemistry Education

Authors

  • Akbarova Saidakhon Rustamovna Chemistry Methodologist Republican Education Center, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Scientific information literacy, chemistry education, critical analysis

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of developing students' skills in working with scientific information — namely, searching, analyzing, evaluating, and drawing conclusions — within the framework of school chemistry education. Modern chemistry instruction increasingly requires learners not only to memorize factual content but also to locate reliable scientific data, critically assess its credibility, and use it as a basis for informed decision-making. Drawing on established research in science education, argumentation theory, and chemistry-specific critical thinking, the article develops and substantiates a stage-based methodology consisting of four interrelated components: information search, content analysis, source and data evaluation, and conclusion formulation. For each stage, the article proposes concrete instructional tools and task types — including problem-based chemistry assignments, laboratory-linked research tasks, and structured discussion activities — and illustrates their application through a worked example drawn from a socioscientific chemistry topic. The article is conceptual and methodological in nature: it proposes and theoretically justifies a teaching framework rather than reporting the results of an empirical trial. The article concludes with practical recommendations for chemistry teachers seeking to integrate information-literacy components into standard curricula, and outlines a design for the empirical study that would be needed to test the methodology's effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.

Jacob, C. (2004). Critical thinking in the chemistry classroom and beyond. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(8), 1216.

Kogut, L. S. (1996). Critical thinking in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 218–221

Mabrouk, P. A. (2024). Evaluating threshold concepts for information literacy in an undergraduate analytical chemistry literature research project. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1002–1015

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824.

Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883

Sjöström, J., Yavuzkaya, M., Guerrero, G., & Eilks, I. (2024). Critical chemical literacy as a main goal of chemistry education aiming for climate empowerment and agency. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(10), 4189–4195.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Akbarova Saidakhon Rustamovna. (2026). Developing A Methodology For Enhancing Students’ Skills In Searching, Analyzing, Evaluating, And Drawing Conclusions From Scientific Information In Chemistry Education. International Scientific and Current Research Conferences, 1(01), 71–75. Retrieved from https://www.orientalpublication.com/index.php/iscrc/article/view/2342